S.3852a (Flanagan, et al.)
A.6023 (Bradley, et al.)
Summary
The bill states that City, Town or Village zoning, planning and
environmental regulations, in place at the time of filing of a completed
application for the development of land, will remain applicable to such
application for no less than six years after the filing, so long as the
applicant is proceeding with the proposed development with due
diligence. An exception to this requirement would apply when there are
changes in federal or state law or where the local municipality can show
by clear and convincing evidence that due to newly discovered
information or changed circumstances it likely that that harm to the
public or the environment may occur and that such harm will not be
prevented by existing laws, regulations or ordinances.
Explanation
This bill will increase the likelihood that sprawling development will
continue unchecked as the ability of municipalities to address such
growth, and consider the cumulative impacts of proposed developments,
would be thwarted by the vesting of development rights at the time the
application is filed. The environmental, economic and social impacts of
sprawling development are measured in increased water and air pollution,
loss of habitat, increased costs to municipalities for water and sewer
infrastructure, increased road building and maintenance and increased
enrollments in public schools. The ability for municipalities to
consider the cumulative impacts of proposed developments is vital to
preserving open space, quality of life, and community character, and
would be virtually impossible under the provisions of this bill.
Furthermore, the bill’s
provision that municipalities can rebut the presumption that the
applicant has vested rights to develop the land only upon a showing of
clear and convincing evidence in a detailed written finding would be a
difficult if not impossible burden for many municipalities to meet. Many
local governments don’t have the necessary technical or financial
resources to allow them to establish such a record.
Environmental Advocates of New York opposes this
bill.