|
Capitol
Watch > 2007 Bill Ratings
A.1143 (Brodsky, et al.)
S.1592 (Libous, et al.) Summary
Explanation
The bill would be even more effective if it were more specific regarding the environmental factors for mapping against the cancer registry data. Instead of making reference to a generic category of environmental facilities and sites in the environmental conservation law, it would be useful to clarify precisely which factors should be used, e.g. pesticide reporting data, Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), inactive hazardous waste sites, oil spill sites and Toxic Release Inventory facilities. It would also be good to specify overlay mapping of other sources of epidemiological information, such as birth defects registry data. In addition, the specificity of the data requested for entry into the cancer registry may raise compliance problems for physicians and, potentially, questions of consent. If consent were required for this kind of information to be gathered and catalogued, the registry might cease to be comprehensive. A closer examination of the logistics and consent issues raised by this bill is needed.
Environmental Advocates of New York strongly supports this bill. |